- INTEL CORE I7 WITH QUICKSYNC FOR HARDWARE DECODING MOVIE
- INTEL CORE I7 WITH QUICKSYNC FOR HARDWARE DECODING DRIVER
But yea a 10700(might as well go 10850k though) will be a good amount faster due to quicksync.
INTEL CORE I7 WITH QUICKSYNC FOR HARDWARE DECODING MOVIE
I think at some point you just bite the bullet and buy something. rewinding the movie on the timeline on the Intel Core i7 10700 will work better due to quicktime Its quicksync, not quicktime. There are always new processors coming and they are always going to be a lot better than the ones we have right now. See Intel’s Global Human Rights Principles.
INTEL CORE I7 WITH QUICKSYNC FOR HARDWARE DECODING DRIVER
QS is great for speed but we do get driver problems quite frequently, especially with new stuff. // Intel is committed to respecting human rights and avoiding complicity in human rights abuses. It has the H.265 thing which may or may not be helpful, but unless you can buy a Skylake at a bargain price why get one? I would expect my playback bug to be fixed in a future version. Only quicksync can be used for decoding h.264 and h.265 footage on the gpu. But try proxies first, your current hardware should be able to edit just fine. will be a good amount faster due to quicksync. It is faster (about 10-20% based on some tests I have done) and pretty much the same price. So its better to buy an Intel Core i7 10700 than Amd Ryzen 7 3700x for. If I was buying a new system now I would buy a Kaby Lake. This is nothing against GV I have been in this business for 20 years and it is based on experience. I would not base my decision to buy based an expectation of a few users on a forum. But I have not heard anything either way. If anyone is going to add QS playback for H.265 is will be GV purely based on the fact that they did it for H.264. If I want QS I just use the fast EDIUS native one (plus there is not enough time in the day to test everything). I did not bother to test it, however, because one of my main reasons to use the TMPEG plug-in or handbreak is the quality I can get from using X.264 instead of QS. TMPEG & handbreak had both options I believe. It may be possible to use a compatible higher-speed memory on a system but the speed will be downgraded to the maximum speed memory supported by the Intel Processor. I have not yet reported it to Grass Valley as it was only recently it came up and only happens on 4K projects with multiple layers (i.e. If I turn off the QS playback they work ok. I believe QSV has two options to choose between speed and quality. Some products can support AES New Instructions with a Processor Configuration update, in particular, i7-2630QM/i7-2635QM, i7-2670QM/i7. Commercial platform offering a subset of Intel vPro® Enterprise features, including Intel® Hardware Shield and Intel® Standard. We will be getting some Kaby Lake processors in to test and I am expecting them to perform better than Skylake but I don't expect much improvement out of the Quick Sync encoding/playback.Hi David - Have you had a chance to to test with an i7-7700k yet? I see the 630 GPU also has h.265 4k 10bit hardware decoding. Intel® Core i5-9500 Processor (9M Cache, up to 4.40 GHz. If you use the latest 2nd5th generation Intel Core i3/i5/i7 processors, you may be able to use the Intel Quick Sync Video H.264 encoder which allows you to. Click on the RUN button at the lower right corner and this video decoder will work immediately with Intel QSV and other advanced technologies (MMX-SSE, Hyper-threading, AMD 3DNow and multiple CPU cores) activated to increase speed. We will be getting some Kaby Lake processors in to test and I am expecting them to perform better than Skylake but I don't expect much improvement out of the Quick Sync encoding/playback. Begin decoding video with Intel Quick Sync Video technology enabled. If you are comparing processors for playback then sometimes it is better to get a higher powered CPU rather than rely on Quick Sync since the high powered CPU soups up all kinds of footage rather than just H.264 based footage. With playback, Quick Sync lets me playback 2 streams of 4K video in a 4K project on an Skylake processor which is about the same as I can manage with an 8 core (and more expensive) Broadwell-E, which does not have Quick Sync and just uses the CPU. With Quick Sync the encoding is WAY faster than not using Quick Sync but some people choose other methods because they can get better quality in other ways, especially at lower bit rates (there are quite a few threads about this on the forum). I doubt whether any editing program will take advantage of the H.265 abilities yet. 5th Generation Intel Core processors (Broadwell): Supports HEVC 8-bit software/hybrid encode. I am not sure whether there are any changes to do with H.264. Wa_cq_url: "/content/The new thing with Kaby Lakes is that they have support for playback of H.265 video in the processor. Wa_english_title: "Intel® Quick Sync Video", Wa_emt_org: "emtorganizationalstructure:dpgdataplatformsgroup", Wa_rintelproduct: "rintelproduct:processors/mobileprocessors", Wa_emttechnology: "emttechnology:inteltechnologies/intelgraphicsandvisualtechnologies/intelquicksyncvideo", Wa_emtcontenttype: "emtcontenttype:salesandmarketingmaterials/marketingarticles",
0 kommentar(er)
